Breach of Confidence: Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets | Forseti Legal Services
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Breach of Confidence:

Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets


Question: What are the legal implications of misusing business secrets in Canada?

Answer: Breaching the confidentiality of business secrets can lead to serious legal consequences under Canadian law. The tort of breach of confidence, as established in the Supreme Court ruling Lac Minerals v. International Corona, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, requires proving that the information was confidential, shared in confidence, and misused by the recipient. Businesses must take care to maintain confidentiality to protect proprietary information and avoid unauthorized use, which can lead to legal disputes. For comprehensive guidance, contact Forseti Legal Services.

Misused Business Secrets

The success of a business may rely heavily upon secret recipes, proprietary software, unique systems, and customized processes; and accordingly, information relating to these key aspects may be highly valued with misuse of such confidential information quite harmful.  The field of tort law includes a cause of action, meaning right to bring a lawsuit, known as breach of confidence which relates to the improper use of information by a person or other business with whom the confidential information was previously shared. Interestingly, where breach of confidence involves information that was previously shared, the wrongfulness arises from improper use of the information rather than theft of the information.

The Law

Per the Supreme Court in the case of Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, the elements requiring proof so to constitute a breach of confidence case are:

  • The information conveyed was confidential;
  • The information was communicated in confidence; and
  • The information was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.

Specifically, per Lac Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court said:


I can deal quite briefly with the breach of confidence issue.  I have already indicated that Lac breached a duty of confidence owed to Corona.  The test for whether there has been a breach of confidence is not seriously disputed by the parties.  It consists in establishing three elements:  that the information conveyed was confidential, that it was communicated in confidence, and that it was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.  In Coco v. A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd., [1969] R.P.C. 41 (Ch.), Megarry J.  (as he then was) put it as follows at p. 47:

In my judgment, three elements are normally required if, apart from contract, a case of breach of confidence is to succeed.  First, the information itself, in the words of Lord Greene, M.R. in the Saltman case on page 215, must "have the necessary quality of confidence about it."  Secondly, that information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence.  Thirdly, there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it . .  .

As a particularly interesting example case, Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 involved the licensing of the recipe for Clamato juice by Duffy-Mott (a company later acquired by Cadbury Schweppes Inc.) to Caesar Canning who then contracted production to FBI Foods Ltd.  After Cadbury Schweppes acquired Duffy-Mott, Caesar Canning was notified of termination of the licensing agreement; however, FBI, who later acquired assets of Caesar Canning, made use of the recipe despite a lack of authorization to do so.

Conclusion

Improper use of secretive information may constitute as the tort of breach of confidence where information was confidential, information was communicated within a confidential context, and the information was then misused by the party that received the communication.

Get a FREE ¼ HOUR CONSULTATION

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
5

NOTE: An extensive amount of online searches featuring “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” typically indicate a pressing need for capable and prompt legal assistance, rather than a focus on a particular title.  In Ontario, licensed paralegals operate under the same Law Society that regulates lawyers and are permitted to represent clients in specific litigation areas.  Core elements of this role include advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise.  Forseti Legal Services offers legal representation within its licensed framework, emphasising strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and persuasive advocacy, all aimed at securing efficient and positive outcomes for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Forseti Legal Services

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Forseti Legal Services. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.217.61
Forseti Legal Services

101 Nappadale Street, Box 95
Woodville, Ontario,
K0M 2T0
 
P: (705) 806-7577
E: info@forsetilegal.services

Business Hours:

08:15AM - 05:00PM
08:15AM - 05:00PM
08:15AM - 05:00PM
08:15AM - 05:00PM
08:15AM - 05:00PM
09:30AM - 01:30PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:
Saturday:

By appointment only.  Call for details.
Messages may be left anytime.







Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A
Ernie, the AI Bot